View all
Web DevelopmentMobile Development UX/UI DesignStaff Augmentation CTO as a ServiceDedicated TeamLow-Code DevelopmentManual testing is often the best choice for new products, UX validation, exploratory testing, and edge cases that are difficult to automate.
Automated testing helps teams validate releases faster, reduce regression risks, and integrate quality checks directly into the development workflow.
Most products benefit from combining both approaches. Manual testing helps uncover unexpected issues, while automated tests provide consistent coverage for critical functionality.
The best testing strategy depends on your product stage, release frequency, technical complexity, and budget. Many teams start with manual QA and gradually introduce automation as the product matures.
Functional testing, exploratory testing, edge cases, and UX validation for web, mobile, and API products.
Automated test suites using Cypress, Playwright, Detox, and Appium with CI/CD integration for faster and more reliable releases.
REST and GraphQL API testing with Postman, Supertest, and contract testing to verify functionality, performance, and reliability.
Automated and manual regression testing to ensure new releases do not break existing functionality.
Performance analysis, load testing, bottleneck detection, and stress testing before major releases.
Authentication, authorization, input validation, and OWASP-focused security checks as part of the QA process.
Testing across multiple devices, operating systems, screen sizes, and mobile environments.
Accessibility reviews covering keyboard navigation, screen readers, color contrast, and WCAG compliance requirements.
1
We review the product, codebase, release process, and existing test coverage to identify risks and define the right testing approach. The output is a QA strategy with recommended tools, priorities, and coverage goals.
2
Testing environments, automation frameworks, test data, and CI/CD integrations are configured to support consistent and repeatable testing workflows.
3
Our team creates test cases, develops automated tests where appropriate, and performs ongoing testing throughout the development cycle. Bugs and findings are documented and tracked within your existing workflow.
4
Regular QA reports provide visibility into test coverage, execution results, critical issues, and overall product quality. Testing processes and automation coverage are continuously refined as the product evolves.

A cryptocurrency trading platform that allows users in Iceland to securely trade and manage digital assets.


An Uber-like app that connects charter flight pilots with travelers, making it easier to book and share the cost of flights to the Bahamas.

Cypress · Playwright
Detox · Appium · XCUITest · Espresso
Supertest · Postman/Newman · Pact
Jest · React Testing Library · Vitest
k6 · Artillery · Lighthouse CI
GitHub Actions · GitLab CI · CircleCI
Jira · Linear · GitHub Issues
1
Our QA engineers work closely with React, Node.js, and React Native applications and can create automated tests in TypeScript, not just execute manual test scenarios.
2
Testing is integrated into the development workflow, with automated checks running before code reaches production.
3
Using tools like Cypress, Playwright, Detox, and Jest allows QA and development teams to work within the same JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem.
4
QA can be delivered as a standalone service for existing engineering teams or integrated into a full development engagement.
Outsourced QA services give you access to dedicated testing specialists who check your product’s quality through manual testing, automation, performance testing, and other quality assurance processes. This way, you don’t need to set up your own in-house QA team.
The cost varies based on how much testing you need, how complex your project is, whether you want automation, and the type of partnership you choose. Some teams only need a one-time QA audit, while others need ongoing testing during development.
Manual and automated testing each have their own strengths. Manual testing works well for exploring new features and reviewing user experience. Automated testing is great for quickly checking releases and catching repeat issues. Most products do best with a mix of both.
Our QA stack includes Cypress, Playwright, Detox, Appium, Jest, Postman, Supertest, k6, and other tools selected based on the platform and testing requirements.
Yes, we test iOS and Android apps on different devices, operating systems, screen sizes, and real-world scenarios to make sure users have a consistent experience.
Yes, we can add automated tests to GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, and other CI/CD pipelines. This helps keep quality checks running throughout development.
Yes, we can do functional, exploratory, usability, and many regression tests without seeing your source code. For advanced automation and more thorough testing, we might need access to the code.
Yes, we provide regular reports. These can include which test cases were run, bug summaries, test coverage, release readiness, and suggestions to improve your product’s quality.
Absolutely. We can provide QA as a separate service and fit it right into your current development process. You don’t need extra development resources from us.
We usually start by reviewing your product, release process, and quality goals. After that, we suggest the best testing approach, tools, and way to work together.
What are you interested in:
Name
Tell us about your project and goals
0/1000
Add your file